Opinion: From the Walmart massacre to an ICE shooting, denying personhood has deadly consequences 66%

By Special to El Paso Matters77%

8/3/2026, 10:04:34 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 61.6% saturation with 447 hits. Analysis detected 2,386 faulty-reasoning hits from 726 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.6% and a BS Rank of 66% (9,638 of 28,068 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the article peer group.

It was seven years ago now, but it still feels like yesterday that 23 people were gunned down in El Paso because of how they looked. 
And today, as much as I’m thinking about the 23 taken from us, I’m also thinking of a 24th. 
Just a few weeks ago, Lorenzo Salgado Araujo was shot to death by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Houston. 
Lorenzo was an unarmed man with no criminal history who was killed on his way to work. 
Witnesses say ICE agents rammed his vehicle then opened fire  and that they were never in any danger from Lorenzo. 
The federal government has insisted on investigating itself and claimed no one had any of the body cameras ICE was given $20 million for. 
It has yet to provide any evidence to justify the shooting other than leaning into a lie that drugs were found in the vehicle afterwards. 
Testing revealed that was never true. 
What happened in Houston was very different from what happened in El Paso, but it’s on my mind because it came from the same place. 
In the years since Aug. 
3, 2019, I’ve written and spoken repeatedly about the danger of the political rhetoric being used against immigrants and Mexican Americans. 
The murderer who drove to El Paso back then did it to stop what he called “the Hispanic invasion of Texas.” 
His own manifesto and statements by his attorneys specifically talked about the political influences that drove him to pull the trigger. 
Politicized hate has only gotten worse since then. 
National and state voices have shamelessly turned to naked racism and dehumanization, and footage uncovered through recent lawsuits has shown ICE agents using racial slurs on the job. 
It’s no wonder that immigration enforcement has turned into an unprofessional and brutal spectacle that’s killed people across the country and led to thousands of detainees, including at camps in El Paso, suffering inhumane conditions that would’ve once been unthinkable in the United States. 
That can only happen when people aren’t thought of as people. 
You don’t shoot someone who’s just going to work or going to Walmart unless you believe they’re “invaders” who are “poisoning our country” or “bringing drugs, bringing crime . . . rapists” who’ve been emptied out of prisons and mental institutions south of us. 
Taking personhood is what makes it possible to take lives. 
I used to think these deaths would change people’s hearts and minds, but I’ve come to realize that lives mean nothing to those who don’t recognize the humanity of the dead in the first place. 
They’ll never see us if we don’t make them. 
I know we can, though. 
We saw how to do it right here in an El Paso courtroom. 
When the Walmart shooter was sentenced, Yolanda Tinajero , the sister of one of the 23, actually hugged him. 
“I want you to see and feel all of us who have been impacted by your actions,” she told him, adding that if he’d just come to El Paso, “We would have opened our doors to you to share a meal, breakfast, lunch or dinner, Mexican-style, so then your ugly thoughts of us that have been instilled in you would have turned around.” 
What Yolanda did in that moment was put the incredible heart of El Paso and communities like it on public display. 
She recognized that the only way to disarm and defeat hate is by showing the world (even the worst parts of it) who we are and how we love. 
She forced the killer to see her. 
It was the first time in all these years he showed any emotion in court. 
There’s a lot to be angry about these days, but anger alone isn’t transformative. 
We’ll never end racist rhetoric  never be safe or equal  until our personhood can’t be denied. 
As we remember the fallen this year, let’s also honor them by showing up and showing out every day and everywhere. 
And let’s do that not just with our strength and resolve and excellence as a border community, but like Yolanda, with the undeniable love that defines us as people. 
Joe Moody represents El Paso’s District 78 and serves as speaker pro tempore in the Texas House of Representatives. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.2%Special to El Paso Matters: 6.4%El Paso Matters: 1.3%Confirmation Bias15.2%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.6%El Paso Matters: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%Special to El Paso Matters: 3.5%El Paso Matters: 1.4%Availability Heuristic10.9%This article: 2.3%Special to El Paso Matters: 2.0%El Paso Matters: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic2.3%This article: 3.9%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.9%El Paso Matters: 0.2%Hindsight Bias3.9%This article: 2.9%Special to El Paso Matters: 2.5%El Paso Matters: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias2.9%This article: 5.4%Special to El Paso Matters: 7.6%El Paso Matters: 3.1%Framing Effect5.4%This article: 2.6%Special to El Paso Matters: 3.7%El Paso Matters: 0.5%Loss Aversion2.6%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 1.4%El Paso Matters: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 1.0%El Paso Matters: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.7%Special to El Paso Matters: 2.2%El Paso Matters: 1.3%Optimism Bias4.7%This article: 6.1%Special to El Paso Matters: 1.3%El Paso Matters: 0.9%Pessimism Bias6.1%This article: 25.3%Special to El Paso Matters: 5.0%El Paso Matters: 3.7%Negativity Bias25.3%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.7%El Paso Matters: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.8%El Paso Matters: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error6.2%This article: 1.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.1%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias1.0%This article: 7.9%Special to El Paso Matters: 1.8%El Paso Matters: 0.4%In-Group Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Special to El Paso Matters: 7.2%El Paso Matters: 1.4%Halo Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.7%Special to El Paso Matters: 1.4%El Paso Matters: 0.6%Recency Bias4.7%This article: 2.9%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.2%El Paso Matters: 0.1%Primacy Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.9%Special to El Paso Matters: 1.6%El Paso Matters: 1.5%Appeal to Authority2.9%This article: 13.8%Special to El Paso Matters: 3.4%El Paso Matters: 0.7%False Dilemma13.8%This article: 8.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 1.3%El Paso Matters: 0.5%Slippery Slope8.0%This article: 3.9%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.8%El Paso Matters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning3.9%This article: 14.9%Special to El Paso Matters: 5.0%El Paso Matters: 1.6%Hasty Generalization14.9%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.2%El Paso Matters: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.6%El Paso Matters: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 35.8%Special to El Paso Matters: 7.4%El Paso Matters: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion35.8%This article: 5.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 2.3%El Paso Matters: 0.3%Begging the Question5.0%This article: 2.9%Special to El Paso Matters: 1.3%El Paso Matters: 1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.9%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.4%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.3%El Paso Matters: 0.3%Burden of Proof3.4%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.9%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.6%El Paso Matters: 0.1%Composition/Division2.9%This article: 6.6%Special to El Paso Matters: 1.9%El Paso Matters: 1.3%Anecdotal6.6%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.7%Special to El Paso Matters: 1.0%El Paso Matters: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.7%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.9%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.3%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Middle Ground1.9%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.9%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.8%El Paso Matters: 0.5%Unattributed Quote2.9%This article: 12.5%Special to El Paso Matters: 1.9%El Paso Matters: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection12.5%This article: 61.6%Special to El Paso Matters: 7.9%El Paso Matters: 0.9%Biased Writer Voice61.6%This article: 20.2%Special to El Paso Matters: 4.3%El Paso Matters: 0.9%Indoctrination20.2%This article: 16.1%Special to El Paso Matters: 1.6%El Paso Matters: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias16.1%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Special to El Paso Matters: 2.8%El Paso Matters: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

726 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers11%attributed speech644writer words
Selected voice

Yolanda Tinajero

100%flagged-word coverage
63 attributed words77% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+95.7 ptsWriter: 4.3%Yolanda Tinajero: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-69.4 ptsWriter: 69.4%Yolanda Tinajero: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-22.8 ptsWriter: 22.8%Yolanda Tinajero: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-18.2 ptsWriter: 18.2%Yolanda Tinajero: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.3 ptsWriter: 3.3%Yolanda Tinajero: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.