Publication summary
35% 26 analyzed articles/videos 34,662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fresnoland results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 8,397 hits . Analysis detected 71,398 faulty-reasoning hits from 141,256 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 20% (450 of 556 publications). This Fresnoland is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 141,256
Article count: 26
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.1% percentile 1.0% BS Score26 analyzed articles141.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst