Author summary
58% 1 analyzed article/video 626 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Parsons results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , In-Group Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 393 hits . Analysis detected 1,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (2,175 of 9,093 authors). This Rob Parsons is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Rob Parsons
Author details
Total words: 2,504
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.1% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 15.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst