Author summary
66%3 analyzed articles/videos3,252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diego Vargas results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 991 hits. Analysis detected 8,872 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,008 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 29% (6,202 of 8,679 authors). This Diego Vargas is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Diego Vargas
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
29%Diego Vargas (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,008
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

29% percentile
025507510028.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles13K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate