Author summary
66% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diego Vargas results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 991 hits . Analysis detected 8,872 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,008 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 29% (6,202 of 8,679 authors). This Diego Vargas is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group. Diego Vargas
Author details
Total words: 13,008
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst