Author summary
⁠33%5 analyzed articles/videos5,108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Annelise Bowers results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 1,192 hits. Analysis detected 9,626 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,432 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (8,145 of 8,927 authors). This Annelise Bowers is better (less manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group.
Annelise Bowers
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠9%Annelise Bowers (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 20,432
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

9% percentile
02550751008.8% percentile
1.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles20.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos