Author summary
43%3 analyzed articles/videos1,856 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Vogelsong results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 544 hits. Analysis detected 4,942 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,970 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 20% (6,862 of 8,557 authors). This Sarah Vogelsong is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Sarah Vogelsong
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
20%Sarah Vogelsong (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,970
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

20% percentile
025507510019.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate