Topic summary
77% 18 analyzed articles/videos 12,038 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aging results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 2,979 hits . Analysis detected 36,499 faulty-reasoning hits from 59,456 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 7% (20,356 of 21,785 topics). This Aging is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group. Aging
Topic details
Total words: 59,456
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.6% percentile 1.2% BS Score18 analyzed articles59.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst