Publication summary
14% 46 analyzed articles/videos 41,394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wisconsin Watch results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 6,758 hits . Analysis detected 73,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 180,439 analyzed words across 46 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 6% (519 of 552 publications). This Wisconsin Watch is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 180,439
Article count: 46
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.0% percentile 0.8% BS Score46 analyzed articles180.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst