Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corrie Pelc results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 948 hits . Analysis detected 8,138 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,852 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 37% (5,610 of 8,893 authors). This Corrie Pelc is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group. Corrie Pelc
Author details
Total words: 12,852
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst