Publication summary
63% 100 analyzed articles/videos 45,622 analyzed words
BS Summary: These STAT results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 15,436 hits . Analysis detected 146,961 faulty-reasoning hits from 208,297 analyzed words across 100 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 39% (337 of 548 publications). This STAT is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 208,297
Article count: 100
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score100 analyzed articles208.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst