Author summary
72%5 analyzed articles/videos2,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Joseph results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 947 hits. Analysis detected 6,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,340 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 33% (5,866 of 8,739 authors). This Andrew Joseph is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Andrew Joseph
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
33%Andrew Joseph (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,340
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

33% percentile
025507510032.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.6%7.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.1%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos