Author summary
51%2 analyzed articles/videos1,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Helen Branswell results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 719 hits. Analysis detected 6,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,958 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 30% (6,029 of 8,529 authors). This Helen Branswell is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Helen Branswell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
30%Helen Branswell (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,958
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

29% percentile
025507510029.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles10K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos