Author summary
⁠46%5 analyzed articles/videos1,037 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elaine Chen results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 386 hits. Analysis detected 2,528 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,148 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (5,004 of 8,678 authors). This Elaine Chen is better (less manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Elaine Chen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠43%Elaine Chen (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,148
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

42% percentile
025507510042.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos