Author summary
65%9 analyzed articles/videos1,235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Feuerstein results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 941 hits. Analysis detected 5,149 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,344 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (3,825 of 9,437 authors). This Adam Feuerstein is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Adam Feuerstein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
60%Adam Feuerstein (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,344
Article count: 9
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score9 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.8%10.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 14.8%14.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate