Author summary
4%1 analyzed article/video3,214 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sai Rajagopal results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 2.4% saturation with 312 hits. Analysis detected 2,399 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (8,592 of 8,656 authors). This Sai Rajagopal is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.
Sai Rajagopal
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
1%Sai Rajagopal (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,856
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

1% percentile
02550751000.7% percentile
0.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos