Author summary
17% 1 analyzed article/video 999 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noah Sheidlower results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Self-Serving Bias , and Framing Effect , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 192 hits . Analysis detected 1,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 13% (7,711 of 8,814 authors). This Noah Sheidlower is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group. Noah Sheidlower
Author details
Total words: 3,996
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.5% percentile 1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.8% 4.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst