Author summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video1,169 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chesnie Wardell results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 324 hits. Analysis detected 3,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (4,791 of 8,766 authors). This Chesnie Wardell is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Chesnie Wardell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠46%Chesnie Wardell (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,676
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

45% percentile
025507510045.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.8%2.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate