Speaker summary
62% 16 analyzed articles/videos 1,507 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Jordan results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Begging the Question , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 319.687 hits . Analysis detected 3,367.555 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,507 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 3% (43,849 of 44,813 speakers). This Jim Jordan is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group. Jim Jordan
Speaker details
Total words: 1,507
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.2% percentile 4.3% BS Score16 analyzed videos1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst