Author summary
43% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Rosen results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 1,099 hits . Analysis detected 8,634 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,196 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 18% (7,217 of 8,785 authors). This Jacob Rosen is better (less manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group. Jacob Rosen
Author details
Total words: 14,196
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst