Author summary
57% 1 analyzed article/video 912 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nikole Killion results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 516 hits . Analysis detected 2,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,614 of 9,089 authors). This Nikole Killion is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group. Nikole Killion
Author details
Total words: 3,648
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 14.1% 14.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 14.1%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst