Publication summary
80% 118 analyzed articles/videos 57,881 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Daily Caller results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 24,219 hits . Analysis detected 256,218 faulty-reasoning hits from 266,670 analyzed words across 118 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (241 of 548 publications). This The Daily Caller is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 266,670
Article count: 118
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score118 analyzed articles266.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst