Author summary
63%6 analyzed articles/videos4,336 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anthony Iafrate results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 1,427 hits. Analysis detected 13,187 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,820 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (6,808 of 8,877 authors). This Anthony Iafrate is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Anthony Iafrate
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
24%Anthony Iafrate (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 19,820
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510023.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles19.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate