Publication summary
87% 23 analyzed articles/videos 20,468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WhoWhatWhy results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 14,056 hits . Analysis detected 97,503 faulty-reasoning hits from 81,547 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 71% (165 of 552 publications). This WhoWhatWhy is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 81,547
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score23 analyzed articles81.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Publication 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 13.9% 13.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 17.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 9.6%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Publication 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst