Author summary
53% 1 analyzed article/video 1,051 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jenna Jarrah results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 360 hits . Analysis detected 2,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 38% (5,498 of 8,785 authors). This Jenna Jarrah is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group. Jenna Jarrah
Author details
Total words: 4,204
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst