Author summary
97%11 analyzed articles/videos6,908 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Klaus Marre results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.7% saturation with 10,594 hits. Analysis detected 57,111 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,830 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,758 of 8,882 authors). This Klaus Marre is worse (more manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Klaus Marre
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
81%Klaus Marre (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 28,830
Article count: 11
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

80% percentile
025507510080.2% percentile
3.9% BS Score11 analyzed articles28.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 36.8%36.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 23.1%23.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 10.7%10.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 16.1%16.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.3%9.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 23.1%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Author 22.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 16.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Author 10.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate