Keyword summary
94% 140 analyzed articles/videos 65,391 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 33,963 hits . Analysis detected 300,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 280,430 analyzed words across 139 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 36% (34,428 of 53,833 keywords). This Oil is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. Oil
Keyword details
Total words: 280,430
Article count: 139
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score139 analyzed articles280.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst