Publication summary
69% 21 analyzed articles/videos 19,938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Responsible Statecraft results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 7,997 hits . Analysis detected 64,858 faulty-reasoning hits from 86,105 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 42% (320 of 550 publications). This Responsible Statecraft is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 86,105
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score21 analyzed articles86.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 9.3% 9.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst