Author summary
93% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,561 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stavroula Pabst results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 889 hits . Analysis detected 7,269 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,244 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (3,178 of 8,801 authors). This Stavroula Pabst is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group. Stavroula Pabst
Author details
Total words: 6,244
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 14.2% 14.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Author 3.4% 3.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst