Author summary
99%4 analyzed articles/videos294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samia Nakhoul results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.5% saturation with 1,146 hits. Analysis detected 7,438 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,224 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 93% (596 of 8,524 authors). This Samia Nakhoul is worse (more manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Samia Nakhoul
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
93%Samia Nakhoul (selected)8%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,224
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

93% percentile
025507510093.0% percentile
7.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 24.5%24.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 14.9%14.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 11.1%11.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 35.5%35.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 27.0%27.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 7.4%7.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.5%9.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 35.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 27.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Author 11.1%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Author 10.0%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.5%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.4%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate