Author summary
40%2 analyzed articles/videos2,007 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ravi Agrawal results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and False Dilemma, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 908 hits. Analysis detected 11,639 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,264 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 9% (8,187 of 8,953 authors). This Ravi Agrawal is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group.
Ravi Agrawal
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
9%Ravi Agrawal (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 24,264
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

9% percentile
02550751008.6% percentile
1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles24.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos