Author summary
89% 1 analyzed article/video 1,231 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jillian Ambrose results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 1,081 hits . Analysis detected 5,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,924 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (2,200 of 9,145 authors). This Jillian Ambrose is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group. Jillian Ambrose
Author details
Total words: 4,924
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.0% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.9% 21.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 19.2% 19.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 21.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst