Breitbart90%

'It’s Killing Your Country': Trump Blasts Migrant 'Invasion' of Europe, Says He Told New UK Leader Burnham to Fix Borders 89%

By Oliver JJ Lane89%

7/29/2026, 10:46:08 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 49.2% saturation with 416 hits. Analysis detected 2,679 faulty-reasoning hits from 846 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 76.7% and a BS Rank of 89% (3,113 of 27,714 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.80% of the article peer group.

U.S. 
President Donald Trump blasted Europe’s ongoing migrant crisis and its political leaders for doing nothing to stem it, as he revealed his recent discussion with new British Prime Minister Andy Burnham touched both on border control and the UK’s botched energy policy. 
President Trump took questions in the Oval Office on Wednesday evening as he announced ambitious plans to rebuild Washington Dulles airport  presently “one of the worst airports anywhere in the world”  and when asked about his conversations with Britain's newly appointed Prime Minister Andy Burnham, expressed his concern about the UK government's total resistance to good advice on some key policy areas. 
Trump and several of his most senior colleagues have repeatedly warned Britain and Europe about its damaging approach to open borders and he touched upon this again, stating he had mentioned “briefly” the importance of border control on a call with Burnham. 
The United Kingdom has a “huge immigration problem”, President Trump said, and referring to ongoing decline in the government's ability to manage the situation he added that there are “people coming from all over the world and just camping out in your country”. 
This lackadaisical state approach to border control contrasts harshly with the United States, President Trump said, given the “tough” approach to migration which is already seeing results. 
The President continued: “Our borders are very strong and your borders are very weak, he’s got that problem”. 
Whether it is something Prime Minister Burnham intends to tackle or not  and given he was appointed to the leadership role through an internal party coup, meaning there was no national election campaign meaning Burnham never had to trade promises of border control with the public for votes, and his Labour Party's absolute love of open borders in general, it seems unlikely  it is also a situation he inherited and one that exists across many European states. 
Responding to a British jounralist in the Oval Office who prompted Trump on Burnham having skirted the issue of border control in the course of his premiership so far, the President said “he’s going to have to mention it because it's killing your country” and reflected of his predecessor in Downing Street: “I know Starmer did very little about it”. 
Of the wider European problem, President Trump went on: “they're coming from all over the world, they're coming from Africa, they're coming from South America, they're coming from different parts of Asia. 
And they're invading Europe, they're invading Europe, it's an invasion. 
And the UK is a prime suspect.” 
Mass migration is not the only policy area that well-wishing friends of Britain abroad look upon with confusion. 
After years of botched energy policy and a dash to net-zero the United Kingdom suffers some of the highest electricity prices in the world, both for consumers and industrial customers, driving both the cost of living crisis and deindustrialisation of the country. 
The new Prime Minister Andy Burnham has made re-industrialising Britain one of his most visible policy promises, and President Trump revealed the men also discussed the important role abundant, cheap energy plays in that. 
Opening up the North Sea oil and gas field to new exploration and drilling would make the United Kingdom very wealthy if done well, Trump assured. 
Noting positively that Prime Minister Burnham had said he would look into this, the President expressed caution on leaping to believe British leaders when they say they are willing to consider a turn away from net zero, and added “let's see if it happens”. 
For now, the United Kingdom refuses to drill its own oil and gas for national self-image reasons, but still imports these fuels from abroad to keep the lights on, and often at a steep premium. 
Remarkably, much of this enmergy is bought from Norway, which shares the North Sea basin with the United Kingdom in their territorial waters, meaning Britain pays a third party a higher cost to import energy it could simply drill and use itself. 
President Trump said: 
You buy a lot of your energy from the North Sea, you buy from Norway, and Norway gets it from the North Sea. 
And Norway's got trillions of dollars in the bank. 
It sells its oil from the North Sea, but Scotland has a better part of the North Sea… you've got areas of the North Sea that haven't even been explored yet. 
You have one of the most valuable oil finds anywhere in the world, and if the United Kingdom would use it they would be a wealthy country again. 
And do you know what? 
I could not get Starmer to use it. 
It was incredible… You have the finest oil, it's the best oil anywhere in the planet, and it's unbelievable you don't have to pay Norway triple what it costs to take out, you have your own oil and gas. 
If you use the North Sea, the UK will be a really rich country. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 22.2%Oliver JJ Lane: 6.4%Breitbart: 4.1%Confirmation Bias22.2%This article: 1.1%Oliver JJ Lane: 1.6%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias1.1%This article: 17.5%Oliver JJ Lane: 4.1%Breitbart: 3.6%Availability Heuristic17.5%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 1.0%Breitbart: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 7.1%Oliver JJ Lane: 1.0%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias7.1%This article: 11.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 2.5%Breitbart: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias11.0%This article: 8.6%Oliver JJ Lane: 11.9%Breitbart: 10.7%Framing Effect8.6%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.3%Oliver JJ Lane: 2.1%Breitbart: 0.6%Status Quo Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.7%Oliver JJ Lane: 2.6%Breitbart: 3.0%Optimism Bias4.7%This article: 16.7%Oliver JJ Lane: 4.6%Breitbart: 1.6%Pessimism Bias16.7%This article: 49.2%Oliver JJ Lane: 11.8%Breitbart: 9.2%Negativity Bias49.2%This article: 0.9%Oliver JJ Lane: 1.3%Breitbart: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias0.9%This article: 9.3%Oliver JJ Lane: 1.2%Breitbart: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error9.3%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 1.0%Breitbart: 3.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Oliver JJ Lane: 1.7%Breitbart: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 3.8%Breitbart: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.6%Oliver JJ Lane: 1.8%Breitbart: 1.6%Recency Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Oliver JJ Lane: 1.6%Breitbart: 2.5%Ad Hominem7.9%This article: 9.3%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.8%Breitbart: 1.2%Straw Man9.3%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 2.5%Breitbart: 3.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 3.1%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.8%Breitbart: 2.3%False Dilemma3.1%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.3%Breitbart: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.8%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 21.7%Oliver JJ Lane: 12.3%Breitbart: 7.1%Hasty Generalization21.7%This article: 4.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.6%Breitbart: 0.5%Red Herring4.0%This article: 5.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.4%Breitbart: 1.0%Bandwagon5.0%This article: 20.3%Oliver JJ Lane: 8.0%Breitbart: 8.3%Appeal to Emotion20.3%This article: 7.1%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.9%Breitbart: 1.5%Begging the Question7.1%This article: 14.9%Oliver JJ Lane: 2.8%Breitbart: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.9%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.9%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.8%Breitbart: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.9%This article: 3.1%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.7%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature3.1%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.4%Breitbart: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.8%Oliver JJ Lane: 1.1%Breitbart: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.8%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.2%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground5.2%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 2.6%Breitbart: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.4%Oliver JJ Lane: 2.2%Breitbart: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection2.4%This article: 18.1%Oliver JJ Lane: 5.0%Breitbart: 6.6%Biased Writer Voice18.1%This article: 5.1%Oliver JJ Lane: 1.3%Breitbart: 1.7%Indoctrination5.1%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.3%Oliver JJ Lane: 9.2%Breitbart: 6.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias14.3%This article: 0.0%Oliver JJ Lane: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

846 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker63%attributed speech313writer words
Selected voice

Donald Trump

94%flagged-word coverage
533 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Biased Writer Voice-35.2 ptsWriter: 40.3%Donald Trump: 5.1%5.1%Politically Right Leaning -38.7 ptsWriter: 38.7%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+8.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 8.1%8.1%Quote-first Misdirection-6.4 ptsWriter: 6.4%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.