Keyword summary
65% 13 analyzed articles/videos 7,866 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Weapon results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 2,558 hits . Analysis detected 27,386 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,200 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 23% (46,280 of 59,653 keywords). This Nuclear Weapon is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group. Nuclear Weapon
Keyword details
Total words: 35,200
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score13 analyzed articles35.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst