Author summary
88% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,299 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jude Russo results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 2,987 hits . Analysis detected 16,304 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,193 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,357 of 9,471 authors). This Jude Russo is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group. Jude Russo
Author details
Total words: 14,193
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.1% 21.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Straw Man: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst