Author summary
83% 17 analyzed articles/videos 7,028 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sean James results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 3,475 hits . Analysis detected 30,722 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,112 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (4,757 of 8,603 authors). This Sean James is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group. Sean James
Author details
Total words: 28,112
Article count: 17
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score17 analyzed articles28.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst