Author summary
89%9 analyzed articles/videos3,887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cameron Arcand results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 2,104 hits. Analysis detected 18,984 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,548 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (3,258 of 9,314 authors). This Cameron Arcand is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Cameron Arcand
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
65%Cameron Arcand (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,548
Article count: 9
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510065.0% percentile
2.8% BS Score9 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.5%13.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.2%12.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.0%11.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate