Keyword summary
67% 18 analyzed articles/videos 15,918 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Confirmation results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 7,195 hits . Analysis detected 53,671 faulty-reasoning hits from 63,262 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 23% (46,046 of 59,653 keywords). This Confirmation is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group. Confirmation
Keyword details
Total words: 63,262
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score18 analyzed articles63.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst