Author summary
16% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,489 analyzed words
BS Summary: These measley results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 813 hits . Analysis detected 3,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,794 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (7,871 of 8,762 authors). This measley is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group. measley
Author details
Total words: 9,794
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.2% percentile 1.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst