Author summary
88% 18 analyzed articles/videos 5,528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kathianne Boniello results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 4,995 hits . Analysis detected 35,598 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,312 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,181 of 8,605 authors). This Kathianne Boniello is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Kathianne Boniello
Author details
Total words: 26,312
Article count: 18
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score18 analyzed articles26.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.4% 9.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 7.5%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst