Keyword summary
86% 39 analyzed articles/videos 44,443 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alabama results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 13,685 hits . Analysis detected 123,147 faulty-reasoning hits from 175,638 analyzed words across 39 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 13% (49,862 of 56,765 keywords). This Alabama is better (less manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group. Alabama
Keyword details
Total words: 175,638
Article count: 39
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.2% percentile 1.3% BS Score39 analyzed articles175.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst