Author summary
89% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,961 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Nagle results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 3,906 hits . Analysis detected 17,680 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,352 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,651 of 8,712 authors). This Ben Nagle is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group. Ben Nagle
Author details
Total words: 14,352
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.6% percentile 3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.9% 19.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 27.2% 27.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.4% 7.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 27.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 15.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst