Author summary
24%7 analyzed articles/videos2,069 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Virginia Martin results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 339 hits. Analysis detected 4,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,930 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (7,325 of 8,601 authors). This Virginia Martin is better (less manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group.
Virginia Martin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
15%Virginia Martin (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,930
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

15% percentile
025507510014.8% percentile
1.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate