Author summary
63% 1 analyzed article/video 3,335 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yamil Berard results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 1,248 hits . Analysis detected 8,486 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 35% (6,033 of 9,186 authors). This Yamil Berard is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Yamil Berard
Author details
Total words: 13,340
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst