Topic summary
81% 203 analyzed articles/videos 191,566 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Foreign Policy results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 82,857 hits . Analysis detected 750,926 faulty-reasoning hits from 819,639 analyzed words across 202 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (16,539 of 22,135 topics). This Us Foreign Policy is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group. Us Foreign Policy
Topic details
Total words: 819,639
Article count: 202
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score202 analyzed articles819.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst