Author summary
88%2 analyzed articles/videos766 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conover Kennard results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30% saturation with 920 hits. Analysis detected 5,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,064 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,499 of 8,572 authors). This Conover Kennard is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Conover Kennard
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
83%Conover Kennard (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,064
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510082.5% percentile
4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 30.0%30.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 15.3%15.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.7%7.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 9.6%9.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 14.3%14.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.4%15.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 30.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 15.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 14.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%No True Scotsman: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate