Author summary
88% 2 analyzed articles/videos 766 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conover Kennard results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30% saturation with 920 hits . Analysis detected 5,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,064 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,499 of 8,572 authors). This Conover Kennard is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group. Conover Kennard
Author details
Total words: 3,064
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.5% percentile 4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 30.0% 30.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.6% 9.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.3% 14.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.4% 15.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.2% 11.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 30.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% No True Scotsman: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst