Topic summary
67% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stocks results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 1,466 hits . Analysis detected 15,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,340 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 29% (17,601 of 24,545 topics). This Stocks is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group. Stocks
Topic details
Total words: 19,340
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles19.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst