Author summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 843 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neil Winton results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 641 hits . Analysis detected 3,758 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 79% (2,051 of 9,487 authors). This Neil Winton is worse (more manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group. Neil Winton
Author details
Total words: 3,372
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.4% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.0% 14.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst