Topic summary
5% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,700 analyzed words
BS Summary: These School Supplies results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 2.2% saturation with 509 hits . Analysis detected 4,248 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,498 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (23,384 of 23,445 topics). This School Supplies is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group. School Supplies
Topic details
Total words: 23,498
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.3% percentile 0.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles23.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst