Author summary
8% 1 analyzed article/video 924 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chanel Hill results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 2.6% saturation with 95 hits . Analysis detected 812 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 8% (8,763 of 9,483 authors). This Chanel Hill is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group. Chanel Hill
Author details
Total words: 3,696
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.6% percentile 1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst