Author summary
14%2 analyzed articles/videos569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inlander Staff results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Recency Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 266 hits. Analysis detected 1,658 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,390 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,231 of 8,525 authors). This Inlander Staff is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.
Inlander Staff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
16%Inlander Staff (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,390
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

15% percentile
025507510015.2% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos